<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When a Layoff is not a Layoff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonmendelson.com/wp/archives/2009/06/when-a-layoff-is-not-a-layoff.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonmendelson.com/wp/archives/2009/06/when-a-layoff-is-not-a-layoff.php</link>
	<description>Mendelson&#039;s Musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 03:23:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawshucks</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonmendelson.com/wp/archives/2009/06/when-a-layoff-is-not-a-layoff.php/comment-page-1#comment-192757</link>
		<dc:creator>lawshucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonmendelson.com/wp/archives/2009/06/when-a-layoff-is-not-a-layoff.php#comment-192757</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not exactly new, it&#039;s just a horrifically inept spin on an old method of doing business.  In fact, for a long long time, this up-or-out system was SOP at many firms.  In this market, though, it just doesn&#039;t work (the dearly departed can&#039;t pretend they&#039;re &quot;otherwise qualified but looking for other opportunities&quot;).   
 
We wrote about this a few months ago here &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawshucks.com/2009/02/more-hypocrisy-in-stealth-layoffs/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://lawshucks.com/2009/02/more-hypocrisy-in-st...&lt;/a&gt; but no one to date had been so cavalier about it.  If it walks like a duck... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not exactly new, it&#039;s just a horrifically inept spin on an old method of doing business.  In fact, for a long long time, this up-or-out system was SOP at many firms.  In this market, though, it just doesn&#039;t work (the dearly departed can&#039;t pretend they&#039;re &quot;otherwise qualified but looking for other opportunities&quot;).   </p>
<p>We wrote about this a few months ago here <a href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/02/more-hypocrisy-in-stealth-layoffs/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://lawshucks.com/2009/02/more-hypocrisy-in-st.." rel="nofollow">http://lawshucks.com/2009/02/more-hypocrisy-in-st..</a>. but no one to date had been so cavalier about it.  If it walks like a duck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frases</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonmendelson.com/wp/archives/2009/06/when-a-layoff-is-not-a-layoff.php/comment-page-1#comment-189946</link>
		<dc:creator>frases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonmendelson.com/wp/archives/2009/06/when-a-layoff-is-not-a-layoff.php#comment-189946</guid>
		<description>The truth about layoffs appear to me to be about shuffling money from the middle-class to the rich </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth about layoffs appear to me to be about shuffling money from the middle-class to the rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
